NQA
European Commission project  for your
afm logo of dryden aqua active filter media

factory.jpg (3825 bytes)

| AFM homepage | Contact us  | About us |  Shop |

Environmental & sustainable water treatment to save the planet
Trade marked and Patented
| DrydenAqua homepageAFM  homepage Applications for AFM |
          
Large seawater lagoons and lido systems now possible with the minimum of filtration when ACO, NoPhos and APF products are used to treat the water.   Perfotmance factor of public swimming pool systems reduced to less than 2 giving an 80% to 90% reduction in chlorine consumption.
Water Analysis in swimming pools 
Relationship between Mono Di and trichloramine

The relationship between mono, di and trichloramine is a function of the pH of the water and the concentration of ammonium and chlorine in solution.

From German DIN standards 19643 Conditioning Swimming Pool Water chloramine production is a function primarily of the pH of the water. The graph opposite  shows the relationship between chloramine formation and pH.

By way of example,  if we take a pH of 7.4, then there will just be free chlorine and  mono chloramine in the water, technically there should be zero or very little dichloramine and trichloramine. However it is trichloramine that has the characteristic smell, and it is predominantly trichloramine that  stings your eyes in swimming pools. This means that there must be a low pH environment at some point in the system in contact with the water. The production of trichloramine is not a reversible reaction, so if there is a low pH at some location,  then trichloramine level will continue to increase

The low pH is caused by the biofilm  which can develop on every surface in contact with the water. By changing the sand to AFM you reduce the bacterial load by around one million times.  However there will still be bacteria growing on the pipe work and on the tiles. NoPhos will remove or reduce the growth of these bacteria and should be dosed continually into the water.  The NoPhos dose rate should be adjusted to give a zero phosphate reading.  However even if you record a zero phosphate reading you must continue with the NoPhos because phosphate will continue to increase due to the bathers, influent water supply and from other chemical products used in pools.

If the above is accomplished and you still have trichloramine present, it will be a function of the operating procedure, the equipment used or there is a dead area in part of the water treatment circuit. Analysis of the water needs to be conducted at different points in the system to determine the source of the contamination

Equations

Chloramines are formed in water by reaction between chlorine and dissolved proteins and chemicals such as urea (NH2)2CO. The following chlorine reactions are taken from German DIN standards 19643

NH4+ + H2======>   H3O+ + NH3  (bacterial mineralisation decomposition of urea from urine, sweat, etc.) 

NH3+Cl2    <<======>>     NH2Cl     monochloramine............................ pH 6 to pH 8

NH2Cl + Cl2    ======>>    NHCl2     dichloramine .............................. pH5 to pH6

NHCl2 + Cl2     ======>>  NCl3        trichloramine ................................pH <5

NH2R + Cl2     ======>>          NHRCl    alkylmonochloramine  = organo chloramines

(  <<======>> denotes a reversible (equilibrium) reaction; =====> denotes a forward one-way reaction.)

 

  Bacteria will grow on every surface in contact with the water.  Bacteria such as Pseudomonas species develop in chlorinated swimming pool systems due  to their ability to excrete copious quantities of alginate which provides the bacteria with protection against chlorine, even at concentrations as high as 10 mg/l free chlorine the bacteria will thrive.  Bacteria in the water not bound up on a substrate do not excrete alginates, as such they so they are oxidise by chlorine in under 30 seconds, but bacteria growing on the surface of tiles, inside pipes and on the surface of every grain of sand in the the filters are resistant to oxidation. Sand filters operating in swimming pools  function as a Bio-Mechanical filters, the bacteria will very quickly remove dissolved organics matter from the water and turn it into bacterial cell biomass.  A simple analysis of ATP (adenosine tri-phosphate) after swimming pool sand filters confirms that the filters are discharging large quantities of bacterial ectotoxins and endotoxins back into the water.  ATP analysis after AFM filters confirms that bacteria production is at least 1 million times lower than a sand filter.

AFM active filter media is designed to reject bacteria,  the high surface redox potential oxidises bacteria and the high zeta potential prevents then from reaching the surface of AFM, this is part of the Activation process. AFM to crushed glass is like comparing Activated carbon to anthracite.  if you take a handful of AFM media out of a sand filter,  the media will flow through your fingers,  if you take a handful of sand,  it will not flow through your fingers, indeed you can often mould it into the shape of a ball.  The sand grains have become coagulated or stuck together by ectotoxic lipo-saccharide alginates. Because AFM does not support a bacterial cell biomass, dissolved organic matter can not be removed by heterotrophic bacterial assimilation, instead AFM depends upon efficient coagulation and flocculation reactions. This is achieved by using APF injection into a ZPM unit,  it is also essential to back-wash the filter at the correct water flow, >45 m/hr or in accordance to DIN specifications.

DPD 3 reagents for the measurement of total combined chloramines will measure both organo-chloramines as well as inorganic trichloramine.  If the AFM filters are not optimised then the organo-chloramine levels may increase to give a high combined chlorine concentration.  However the toxic trichloramine level will be zero or at a very low concentration,  there will be no smell of high combined chlorine and there will be no complaints from the bathers about sore eyes.

For a toxicity perspective it is important to know what is actually happening in the water. Unfortunately the water analytical techniques available to the swimming pool industry can not achieve this task. However we can make an approximation of the total combined inorganic chloramines by using DPD2 for mono-chloramine analysis and apply an application factor. DPD2 is quite specific for mono-chloramines and there is an equilibrium relationship between mono, di and trichloramine.

Total combined inorganic chlorine equates with approximately 1.4 x (DPD2 - DPD1) =  1.4 x (mono-chloramine) for a sand filtration system.   For AFM systems the relationship is closer to 1.05 x mono-chloramine concentration.   If the pH of the water is above 7.2 and there are no biofilms in the system and technically there should be no di-chloramine or trichloramine and as such the mono-chloramine measurement ( DPD2 - DPD1) will equal the total combined chlorine level.  This is the situation when running pools with AFM using APF, NoPhos and ZPM units under the right conditions.

In Germany, Austria and Switzerland,  the pH is often as low at pH6.8,  from the opposite graph  you will note that there will  be scope for dichloramine to be produced, but not trichloramine.  However dichloramine is a none reversible reaction, and even if a small amount form there is an opportunity for it to accumulate.  For this reason we recommend that pools are not operated below pH7.0.  In the UK and other countries the minimum pH is 7.2.

Low concentrations of dissolved organics are much less harmful than chloramines, especially trichloramine  because they are non toxic, non volatile and are not absorbed through lung tissue into your blood stream.  Dissolved organics still cause an issue when the authorities use DPD3  as a means of monitoring water quality in pools.  However we have known about the organo-chloramine interference of DPD3 since Palin et al 1957,  it has just never been an issue in the past because sand filters are working as biofilters to remove the organics. The deficiencies of DPD3 analysis has been amplified when monitoring AFM systems because the potential for higher dissolved organic ratio of the water.  However most of the dissolved organics can be removed through coagulation and flocculation with APF, NoPhos and ZPM followed by AFM filtration.    Indeed with the development of APF active polyfloc and ZPM units we can now remove essential all the dissolved organics and ammonium through coagulation and flocculation and achieve  combined chlorine levels consistently below 0.05 mg/l and often below 0.01mg/l  even with DPD3 analysis

While DPD3 is subject to serious interference from organo-chloramines and surfactants etc,  we now have public pools operating in Scotland in which the DPD2 and DPD3 are giving the same reading and  the value is less than 0.01mg/l.  When DPD2 & DPD3 tests give the same reading you know that there is zero  dichloramine, trichloramine, organo-chloramines or surfactants in the water, also when DPD2 - DPD1 is less than 0.01 mg/l you also know there is no ammonium or mono-chloramine in the water.  In effect for the first time in the swimming pool industry we have a  simple means of identifying an end point in terms of the best possible pool water quality that you can achieve.

Best possible swimming pool water is as follows;
DPD2 - DPD1  is less than 0.05 mg/l
 DPD3 = DPD 2 + /- 0.02 mg/l

If you do not have the best possible water then the main reasons are as follows;

 

Key points that may cause high organo-chloramine levels  as  measured by DPD3

 

ProblemSolution
UVc ( high or medium pressure)This equipment should not be used in chlorinated or brominated systems,  it will reduced combined chloramines, but increases lipid soluble volatile gas such as THM's and cyanogen chloride that are extremely toxic.
High water flow rates through the filtersReduce water flow through the filters to less than 15 m/hr to improve the coagulation and flocculation reactions, essential to remove cryptosporidium oocysts
No coagulation or flocculationStart APF coagulation at 1 ml of APF per cubic metre of water filtered per hour
Incorrect injection point for APFInject between the pumps and the filters, directly into a ZPM unit
Incorrect injection point for chlorineInject chlorine after the filter (never before the filters)
Slow turn over rateFor a typical public pool the turn-over rate is 4 hours through the filters, for a private pool this may be 6 hours.  If the turn over rate is too slow water quality will deteriorate in the pool.   Turn over rate through the filters should be appropriate for the installation, however it is also a good  idea to recycle the water around the filters and through the pool and a ZPM unit at a higher rate.  The simple action of moving the water actually improves water quality and insures a more stable chemistry.  
Back-wash filters at correct flow rateWhat goes into a filter must come out again or the organics retained by the filter will react with the chlorine and be digested by bacteria. It is recommended that you air purge for 2 to 5 minutes at 95 m/hr prior to a back-wash. Back-wash frequency should be at least once a week at 45 m/hr for 2 to 5 minutes.  For private filters the air purge is not necessary.
The bathersall bathers must shower before entering the pool, oils soap, sun tan  lotion etc etc must be  removed for hair and skin, this is very important
Surfactants and cleaning chemicalsDo not use surfactants anywhere near the pool.   5ml of surfactant in a 50m pool will throw the DPD3 readings off the scale and will seriously affect the performance of the coagulation reactions.  Best cleaning agent is just the pool water and sodium bicarbonate, use a dilute acid on occasions such as  hydrochloric acid to remove scale. Do not use any chemical in or near the water that contain surfactants
dead or dirty areas in the system
a. contamination below filter bed, best to use a DIN standard filter with nozzle distribution plate.
b. dirty scum channels, keep them clean
c. dirty balance tank, clean on a regular basis or fit in place cleaning
d. filter back-wash pipe work should go down to the floor immediately after the filter, not up to the roof
e. poor pipe work installation that leaves a gap in between joins, dirt and bacteria collect in the gaps and cracks
f. pipe work that leaves a dead end containing static water
g. in correct hydraulics, filter flows not balanced
h.  poor grout between tiles, allows bacteria and organics to collect
i. contaminated plastic toys, or pool blanket in contact with the water
j. a condensing environment and drips of contaminated water into the pool

 

High free chlorine levelA  high free chlorine level will tend to produce more chlorine reaction product, operate the pool with as low a chlorine concentration as possible. AFM pools with NoPhos, APF & ZPM will generally use up to 90% less chlorine that regular pool system. The chlorine concentration will also be more stable, so it is easier to reduce the levels. For public pools we recommend a minimum concentration of 0.5 mg/l,  but are testing levels as low as 0.1mg/l on system with a high recycle by pass.
mains water supplycheck the mains water supply  it may be contaminated with organic matter, or ammonium. Water companies often add ammonium to municipal supplies to form mono chloramines to help prevent the formation of THM's, and the mains water  can often be as high a 1 mg/l total combined chlorine

 

Anthracite and Activated Carbon

Both anthracite and activated carbon have been used with AFM ,  but we do not recommend the use of carbon because of the following reasons;

  • the carbon will support a biofilm
  • the biofilm increase the legionella risk
  • bacteria in the biofilm mineralise proteins and urea to produce ammonium which forms inorganic chloramines

However in pools that operate filters at flow-rates greater than 20 m/hr and are not using APF and NoPhos then the addition of a small quantity of activated carbon may be acceptable, no more than 15% activated carbon by bed depth on top of the AFM .   This is a compromise situation, because AFM  can only remove urea and organics slow flow-rates with good coagulation / flocculation.  If you do not have the optimum conditions then organo-chloramine levels will rise and the DPD3 measurement will increase.  The addition of the small layer of activated carbon will help to absorb the organics, produces urease and acts as a biofilter.  This is not an ideal situation but in order to comply with the total combined chlorine level it may be required.

Dryden Aqua are presently investigating the dissolved organic matter and nitrogen balance in pools as well as the DPD3 analytical techniques, we hope to have more information available soon.

 

Urea & Nitrogen cycle in chlorinated systems

Bacteria & Urea

Ammonium and chlorine react to form chloramines so it is important to understand the Nitrogen cycle in a swimming pool.  In accordance to DIN 19643 you do not require the analysis of Urea in public swimming pools, this is because in a standard pool the sand filter acts as a biological filter and most of the urea will be rapidly hydrolysed to ammonium. The ammonium with then react with chlorine for form chloramines. Fish excrete ammonium but all mammals excrete urea in the form of urine and in sweat. The urea is converted to ammonium by the action of a bacterial urease enzyme, the enzyme is found in bacteria, fungi and plants

urea moleculesurea molecules
(NH
2)2CO

The hydrolysis of urea follow the equation below;


                                                            (NH
2)2CO + H2O → CO2 + 2NH3

Bacteria that produce urease may be found on the skin of people or in the intestine, the bacteria are often gram +ve and potentially pathogenic.

Chlorine & Urea

Urea is produced by mammals in their liver as a means of converting waste nitrogen into a pH neutral stable chemical that can be excreted from the body via urine and in sweat. Chlorine will react with urea to form nitriles and  aldehydes. However at the levels used in swimming pools there is little to no reaction between urea and chlorine to form chloramines, but the urea / chlorine compounds will be detected by DPD3 analysis.

Urea and APF reactions

In an AFM  system there will be a low bacterial count and urease level so urea concentration may increase. Coagulation and flocculation will easily remove proteins and amino acids to lower the nitrogen content of the water.  We have also fond that AFM  system will reduce the mono-chloramine concentration. Urea is a bit more difficult to flocculate however if a ZPM unit static mixer is used to mix APF then we can effectively remove urea from solution by the formation of flocculated clathrates.